A fair process when a workplace complaint needs to be looked into properly

When a complaint or allegation is raised, how the business responds matters as much as the outcome. Inject supports employers through workplace investigations from the first assessment to the outcome letter, with a process that is fair to everyone involved and documented well enough to stand up if it’s challenged.

Five steps that keep investigations in the workplace fair and well documented

Each investigation is shaped to the matter in front of the business, but the same five steps sit behind every one.

01

Assess the matter

Decide whether a formal investigation is needed or whether another response fits better.

02

Plan the process

Set out the allegations, the people involved, the evidence needed and a realistic timeline.

03

Gather the facts

Interview the parties and witnesses and collect documents, giving each person a fair chance to respond.

04

Make findings

Weigh the evidence and reach findings on each allegation.

05

Document the outcome

Prepare the report and outcome letters, then advise on next steps.

Most matters that reach an investigation started as a behaviour nobody addressed early

An investigation establishes what happened and gives the business a fair basis for a decision. By the time one is needed, though, there have usually been earlier signals, such as expectations that were never made clear, a policy that said one thing while the team did another, or a manager who wasn’t sure how to raise a concern.

Because Inject works across HR, training and recruitment, the work doesn’t stop at the outcome letter. Once the matter is resolved, we look at what allowed it to build and help put the people practices in place that make the next one less likely. It follows a principle Tommy Sim applies across Inject’s work: soft on the human, hard on the behaviours.

Team working together in an office

The people practices that make the next investigation less likely

Most of these are small, steady habits rather than big programs. Together they mean concerns are raised and handled while they are still a conversation, not a complaint.

02

Confident managers

Training in giving feedback and resolving staff issues, so managers act early and fairly.

Training & Development →
03

Regular check-ins

A monthly one-to-one rhythm that surfaces issues before they turn into formal complaints.

04

Advice before it escalates

A second opinion on a concern while it is still small, from consultants who know the business.

HR Advisory & On Call →

Practical people advice from Lead to Grow, with Tommy Sim

Lead to Grow with Tommy Sim

Should You Fire a High-Performing but Toxic Employee?

Tommy Sim separates headline performance from net contribution, and explains how to handle a high performer the team struggles to work with.

Lead to Grow with Tommy Sim

How Helpful Leaders Deliver Hard Messages Without Becoming Harsh

Some leaders avoid hard messages because they care too much to sound difficult. Tommy Sim on how to be clear and kind at the same time.

Frequently asked questions

Usually when a complaint or allegation involves misconduct, bullying, harassment or a serious breach of policy, and the facts are disputed. Some matters can be resolved without one, which is why the first step is assessing the matter.

It means each person knows the allegations, has a genuine opportunity to respond and has the matter decided on the evidence by someone without a conflict of interest.

It depends on the number of allegations and people involved. A simple matter may take a couple of weeks, while complex matters take longer.

The business receives the findings and outcome documentation, then decides on any action. Inject also looks at what allowed the matter to build, such as unclear expectations or gaps in manager capability, and helps put practices in place to reduce the chance of it happening again.

Talk to us about a workplace matter